Proposed timeframe
The position so far
As you may be aware, the RAINE committee have held six evidence sessions and will now take the time to compile their initial report to the Scottish Parliament. This report will include recommendations from the sessions that were held throughout June, and also from supplementary evidence that has been sent to the Committee following the sessions. The first report will be presented early to mid-September after which it will be debated by the Parliament who will vote on whether the Bill should proceed.
The Scottish Countryside Alliance has reviewed each session in detail and compiled a report that has been sent to the Committee. This report identifies inconsistencies and inaccuracies, seeks to gain evidence relating to some of the claims made by animal welfare and other organisations, and offers evidence supporting our own comments made during this process. In addition to this, we have also requested that the results from the original government consultation be published. The Scottish Government does not have a set period of time for publishing public consultation results, but it is asking one of their own committees to make recommendations on the Bill without first having sight of potentially vital information.
We continue to engage with Ministers, MSP's and Civil Servants from the Bill Team and the Scottish Government Licensing Team. A number of meetings have been held over the parliamentary recess period, and we continue to work hard to ensure that we all come out of this with a workable solution that is implemented on a landscape scale. We will continue to challenge anything that does not fit this description and are determined that the end result will be successfully utilised by all, and not only specific sectors within our community. In pest and predator control we all do the same job and have the same results, so we will continue to present evidence to remind those who form the legislation of this fact.
Licences
Licences have been discussed and considered over the past few weeks, and conversations have been positive. We have a very open relationship with government officials and have been able to make representation on a number of levels where licensing is concerned. We have discussed various existing options including:
The Hunting with Dogs (Scotland) Bill proposes a different licensing scheme. While it is light on specifics, it would be awarded to a person or group of persons, and be assigned to a particular piece of land. This already appears problematic for the issuer, applicant and enforcement agencies. It will be more complex to administer, fund and enforce, yet the Scottish Government appear to favour it. We have concerns whether a licensing system based on land holding could ever be truly workable across Scotland's countryside and, if it is not, there will be questions about whether the rights of those who seek to protect livestock and the environment have been breached. Thankfully the Scottish Government is currently engaging with our sector, and we will continue to work with them to ensure the relevant amendments are made. Licensing is staying, so we need to use our collective rural experience help to shape it in order for it to work for everyone.
Lobbying
Given the timetable for the Bill as it passes through stages 2 and 3, we will be focussing on lobbying in the weeks to come. This is not to say you can't make contact with your local MSP now, you can do so easily here. We will be issuing guidance on lobbying via our Heather Routes newsletter and our social media channels, stipulating the main points where amendments need to be considered.
If you would like to get involved then please watch this space, and make sure you follow us on Facebook and Twitter.